HP Site Print vs Traditional Floor Markings
Comparing HP Site Print technology to traditional painted floor markings reveals significant advantages in precision, durability, and long-term value.
Precision and Accuracy
HP Site Print
- Millimeter-level precision
- Consistent line widths and spacing
- Perfect alignment guaranteed
- Robotic accuracy eliminates human error
Traditional Painted Lines
- Manual layout introduces errors
- Inconsistent line widths
- Alignment issues
- Requires skilled painters
Durability Comparison
HP Site Print
- Permanent markings (5+ years)
- Fade-resistant inks
- Withstands heavy forklift traffic
- Chemical and weather resistant
Traditional Painted Lines
- Requires repainting every 6-12 months
- Fades quickly under traffic
- Chips and peels
- Requires frequent maintenance
Cost Comparison
While HP Site Print has higher initial costs, the long-term savings are significant. Traditional painted lines require frequent repainting, maintenance, and rework, making HP Site Print more cost-effective over time.
Why Choose HP Site Print
HP Site Print provides superior precision, durability, and long-term value compared to traditional methods. For facilities requiring permanent, precise markings, HP Site Print is the clear choice.
Back to Blog
Jan 06, 2026
•
Texan Floor Service
